They are all original reference in a more or less all the same. With using a Gigabyte DS4 motherboard & the Core 2 Duo e8500 running at 3. 8 GHz to making about 17,800 in 3DMark06 and pushed on the CCC-drive limit of 840 of 860.



Stock processor and graphics processing unit clocks does just about 15 thousand. While the game is the real world, what matters, and these networks are 60-70 frames per second while playing Far Cry 2. Very high setting is used along with 4x AA configured while at 1680 x 1050 resolution. This is very good.

I have just read an article today with how the 4770 beat the 4890 while pretty much on par compared to the GTX 280. I am very happy because I have a little Clock; less.

It is definitely the reference design and while I tend to feel like some of the components on the video card appears to be of cheaper quality. The heat sink performs particularly well, while it looks and feels pretty cheap and not very robust.

It is definitely unfortunate that the 9. 4 version of the Catalyst drivers do not make this card work, but the drivers on the CD is working properly. There has been a lot of commotion in the press with these things. It practically a fact that got the company resolved to support the video driver focus.

Not all that long ago I received two 4830 video cards because of the over clocking potential and good bang for the buck ratio however I tend to have trouble getting them to remain over clocked. The latest drivers would not allow them to stay on beat, even if the clocks set to the basic standard is not.

Also, they had the visual artifacts in Far Cry 2 while I had the AA set to on. He was not happy about it, but the 4770 graphics cards seem to be working very well and I’m happy.

It seems that these cards appear possible to squeeze out another 35 to 55 megahertz on the graphics processing unit and the memory of the video card.

Tagged with: • • • • • • • • • • • •

Filed under: General • Products • Review • Video

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!